Lost Ball in High Weeds header image 2

Keyword Research is a Necessary Suck

March 5th, 2010 · 7 Comments

I’ve been giving a lot of thought to keyword research. Probably too much. I’ve spent the better part of the last couple of weeks trying to find keywords to build sites around. This is possibly a worse activity than getting backlinks. It’s very disappointing to try to find keywords that pay AND those that have visitors AND you can compete with. The ever elusive “green keywords”.

Market Samurai and Micro Niche Finder helps. I find potential keywords in MFN and drop them in MS to see if the competition sucks or not. Most times it sucks. Have you noticed how incredibly competitive keywords are? Maybe I am the exception here but I may find but a few keywords worthy of using in an hour of punching in ideas. I probably would have better luck panning for gold in the drainage ditch across the street.

It’s just a pains-taking exercise. Mostly futile. Sometimes a winner. Whatever. It’s all in the game. You have to start somewhere and grabbing the best keywords you can is just prudent. But for me that’s where it ends. After I get indexed keywords start populating my Analytics. It may be 3-6 months before anything happens. You just have to keep getting backlinks obviously. Some work out. Others languish in the swamp. That’s why we sling ‘em far and wide. But those new keywords are what I start working with.

I came across this excellent article from Wordtracker I thought I’d share. It’s about long tail keywords. Really there is nothing in here that you haven’t read before at Griz’s site. Griz talked about writing long posts over a year ago. This article pretty much says the same thing. But the article gives you a good perspective of “head” keywords – those that everyone targets at the start and desperately want to rank  and “long tail keywords” – the keywords that result in 90% of folks finding your shitty blog. Here’s the meat of the post:

Head keywords remain irresistible to many SEOs and website owners. They want to see their site top of Google’s results pages for them. They become trophy keywords.

Plus, few people want to go through the learning curve required to start thinking about groups of keywords (keyword niches).

But as well as ignoring most searches, head keywords are very competitive. Increasingly, despite Google’s fight against paid links, to get top of Google for the big money keywords you need to pay for your site’s inbound link power. Which we don’t want to do, so…

So let’s learn how to play with the long tail…
How to make a profit in the long tail

How do you make a profit from keywords that bring just one visit a month? Easy, you target lots of them at once – you target groups of keywords (keyword niches). Here’s how…

Let’s start simply with one page. Your SEO might focus on one or two keywords but you’re really targeting those keywords and their long tails. And the more relevant and related words on your page, the more of that tail you can get results for. I love 2,000 word articles. ..

…This long tail tactic is so effective that you can get great results from a page without getting anything from its primary target keyword. E.g. the page mentioned above doesn’t get a top 10 ranking for either swot analysis or strengths and weaknesses. I summarize this tactic as …

Target the head and exploit the tail

This does not mean that you should spend hours stuffing (or just adding) relevant keywords to your pages. That spoils your copy and usually takes too long to be profitable. It means that you:

Plan the structure of your site’s content, organizing it into categories, e.g. sports cars and family cars for a car site.

Allocate (e.g.‘tag’) existing content to relevant categories.

Each category has a category home page, e.g. a sports car page, that lists links to relevant pages on your site.

For each category, find target keywords (of course I really mean keyword niches). E.g. italian sports cars, sports car insurance.

If a keyword niche is big then make it a category. E.g. italian sports cars might become a category. Planning a site’s structure can be a big job.

For each target keyword, commission or write a long article with lots of words.

Don’t sweat on the individual keywords within your articles. Leaving that copy natural will target 1000s (sometimes 10s of thousands) of keywords. The big job is the initial keyword research and subsequent site planning.

Analyze results. Which keyword niches bring the most response? Continue your keyword research – looking for more keyword niches to target.

Word.

Tags: Workshop

Submit Article: Digg | Del.icio.us | Stumble it!



7 responses so far ↓

  • Dave // Mar 5, 2010 at 8:10 pm

    So in theory one could spend a lot less time chasing links and a lot more time just trying to create massive massive amounts of content, and go for long tail niche volume just by having massive amounts of content. Sort of what forums kind of do, except the posts in forums are often low quality, and short. But combining them together say 20-100 posts to a page… eh, it always comes back to lots of work, some of it drudgery. darn.

  • JJ // Mar 5, 2010 at 10:21 pm

    Ditto as usual. You have a profound way of stating the obvious. I’m beginning to really like you. You make me feel better about all of this.

    A few weeks ago I started doing a little trick with bulk registration to make things faster. I know other people have done this , but I thought I was clever when I thought of it.

    Since it is better to get the exact keywords in the url I would go to Google Keyword Tool and find a batch. Then I would copy and paste the list in GoDaddy’s bulk registration tool. Really quickly I found all of the available “exact domains” for that niche. Then I bought MNF and it does all that for me. Just slower.

    One question I have about MNF. How does it find its keywords. It seems to be different from the Google Keyword Tool. There’s always these funky variations of the seed word. Most of the time the keywords are not related at all and sometimes they are better.

  • Silver Rose // Mar 6, 2010 at 11:03 am

    I’ve given up using the keyword tools, and now go on hunch. My two biggest successes were down to hunches, where the keyword tools said there was no traffic, but my gut knew there was. And I get a good 4000 hits per month to one of the sites and about 1000 hits per month to the other.

    I think the problem is that the keyword tools try to smooth the traffic over the year, giving an average per month. But if you are at the start of a trend, the tools will show no traffic (because they look backwards), and you just have to take your chances and go for it. Because everyone else is looking at the keyword tools and holding back, you get an early mover advantage that really pays off.

    A lot of this is about making your own luck.

  • Splork // Mar 6, 2010 at 11:58 am

    Hey JJ. Thanks for reading. I think it has to do with the synonym tool. MFN may add new variations but I don’t think it cheat you out of what the Google tool gives you directly.

  • Dave@Olive Articles // Mar 6, 2010 at 12:23 pm

    Time and again it seems to be my own content that gives the best keywords, just as you infer. Get the links and the keywords start populating the stats.

    Stuff that (if I look) gives a big fat zero in research tools yet actually gives loads of traffic.

    I am also finding wordtracker much more reliable than the google tool.

  • Splork // Mar 6, 2010 at 12:25 pm

    Sliver Rose, I don’t blame you for forgoing the keyword tools. I tend to use them anymore as a starting point. Then I use the Analytics to see what is actually working and keep building on those. It’s not a perfect deal but it’s what I have to work with. My best performing website over the last 4 years was from a site a built without regard t keywords.

  • JJ // Mar 6, 2010 at 4:27 pm

    Thanks! I’ll turn it off and see if I like the results. Hurry up and write another post : )

Leave a Comment