<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Article Landfills</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostballinhighweeds.com/article-landfills/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostballinhighweeds.com/article-landfills/</link>
	<description>A Blogger's Struggle With Online Success</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 02:22:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SuperbadIM</title>
		<link>http://lostballinhighweeds.com/article-landfills/comment-page-1/#comment-73236</link>
		<dc:creator>SuperbadIM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 23:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostballinhighweeds.com/?p=875#comment-73236</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s interesting to think that Google created this formula where we now think of what Google robots want instead of what people want.  Are robots taking over the www?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting to think that Google created this formula where we now think of what Google robots want instead of what people want.  Are robots taking over the www?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Splork</title>
		<link>http://lostballinhighweeds.com/article-landfills/comment-page-1/#comment-72049</link>
		<dc:creator>Splork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 03:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostballinhighweeds.com/?p=875#comment-72049</guid>
		<description>Yea, I see the straight line as easy and do it.  

I&#039;m happy to get backlinks where I can but funneling traffic is where it&#039;s at.  I&#039;m using Blogger, Wordpress and Hubpages to pretty good effect for that. And yea, I use other social communities to drive traffic as well. It&#039;s a good plan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, I see the straight line as easy and do it.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m happy to get backlinks where I can but funneling traffic is where it&#8217;s at.  I&#8217;m using Blogger, WordPress and Hubpages to pretty good effect for that. And yea, I use other social communities to drive traffic as well. It&#8217;s a good plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo Dimilo</title>
		<link>http://lostballinhighweeds.com/article-landfills/comment-page-1/#comment-72041</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo Dimilo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostballinhighweeds.com/?p=875#comment-72041</guid>
		<description>Hey Splork,

The problem is that most article marketers think of syndication in the most straight line focus as they can.  They think that syndication is simply for article directories.

In reality, the better option when it comes to article syndication is to attack syndicated sites with communities attached to them and then let THAT ball roll.

Plus there are closed communities like BetterNetworker and choosy communities like SocialMediaToday which can get you a great backlink and a community that doesn&#039;t mind passing it around.  That means more mileage for your effort.

As far as article directories are concerned, you are right....very few article directories are worth expending the effort for the paltry backlink that they give.

Hell, if ezinearticles was only good for a backlink, I probably wouldn&#039;t bother.  The fact that they rank for long tail keywords so easily and can funnel traffic is the only reason I use them these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Splork,</p>
<p>The problem is that most article marketers think of syndication in the most straight line focus as they can.  They think that syndication is simply for article directories.</p>
<p>In reality, the better option when it comes to article syndication is to attack syndicated sites with communities attached to them and then let THAT ball roll.</p>
<p>Plus there are closed communities like BetterNetworker and choosy communities like SocialMediaToday which can get you a great backlink and a community that doesn&#8217;t mind passing it around.  That means more mileage for your effort.</p>
<p>As far as article directories are concerned, you are right&#8230;.very few article directories are worth expending the effort for the paltry backlink that they give.</p>
<p>Hell, if ezinearticles was only good for a backlink, I probably wouldn&#8217;t bother.  The fact that they rank for long tail keywords so easily and can funnel traffic is the only reason I use them these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Splork</title>
		<link>http://lostballinhighweeds.com/article-landfills/comment-page-1/#comment-71976</link>
		<dc:creator>Splork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostballinhighweeds.com/?p=875#comment-71976</guid>
		<description>Yep. In many cases domain matching is all you need these days. Sub-domain matches work too. The web is a landfill. Craptastic goodness of mediocre content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep. In many cases domain matching is all you need these days. Sub-domain matches work too. The web is a landfill. Craptastic goodness of mediocre content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://lostballinhighweeds.com/article-landfills/comment-page-1/#comment-71974</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostballinhighweeds.com/?p=875#comment-71974</guid>
		<description>&quot;Google is still seriously rewarding single-topic focus and matching domain name over many other factors. So crap can still get to the top&quot;

I installed a Wordpress keyword matched domain - nothing beyond Hello World - forgot about it for a week and then discovered it was on page two of Google...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Google is still seriously rewarding single-topic focus and matching domain name over many other factors. So crap can still get to the top&#8221;</p>
<p>I installed a WordPress keyword matched domain &#8211; nothing beyond Hello World &#8211; forgot about it for a week and then discovered it was on page two of Google&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://lostballinhighweeds.com/article-landfills/comment-page-1/#comment-71941</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 18:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostballinhighweeds.com/?p=875#comment-71941</guid>
		<description>I have been outranked by some of the other article directories -- buzzle comes to mind -- and my site is of good quality, aged and in DMOZ. (But it is not ultra focused.)

Oh, and I know of at least one site which ranks highly for a competitive term &lt;i&gt;purely&lt;/i&gt;  through the use of crappy directories. I&#039;m tempted to create a subdomain or new domain to see if I can follow this particular crappy site&#039;s link footprint and then follow up with a few good links.

Google is still seriously rewarding single-topic focus and matching domain name over many other factors. So crap can still get to the top.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been outranked by some of the other article directories &#8212; buzzle comes to mind &#8212; and my site is of good quality, aged and in DMOZ. (But it is not ultra focused.)</p>
<p>Oh, and I know of at least one site which ranks highly for a competitive term <i>purely</i>  through the use of crappy directories. I&#8217;m tempted to create a subdomain or new domain to see if I can follow this particular crappy site&#8217;s link footprint and then follow up with a few good links.</p>
<p>Google is still seriously rewarding single-topic focus and matching domain name over many other factors. So crap can still get to the top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert C - The Wholesale Products Guy</title>
		<link>http://lostballinhighweeds.com/article-landfills/comment-page-1/#comment-71905</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert C - The Wholesale Products Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 03:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostballinhighweeds.com/?p=875#comment-71905</guid>
		<description>Splork Sez..

&quot;I can tell you that I would rather have a single outstanding authority site link to my site naturally than all the backlinks I could collect from all the article directory and blog distribution centers put together.&quot;

I hear ya. If you google &quot;forgive all ebay sins&quot; you will find that this particular pile of manure that I have fertilized the web with, has not done much in terms of &quot;growing&quot; my PR, or traffic..

Even though the article has been picked up by a variety of websites, I don&#039;t think one web page where the article resides, has any substantial link juice or authority. 

So, to your point about getting some authority site love, please to enjoy..

How to Get Featured on the New York Times, CNN, CNET and Newsweek..

http://www.problogger.net/archives/2008/10/05/how-to-get-featured-in-the-new-york-times-cnn-cnet-and-newsweek/

It is by Kim Roach. You may know all of these 
methods already, but if not, then I hope you get something out of it. I know I did..

You would need to write some great content, but you got the skills to pay the bills - lol. 

Coming up with one, or maybe two good stellar articles, including the link of choice, some anchor text, could be one way to get the authority link you seek. 

Just sayin..

Robert C - The Wholesale Products Guy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Splork Sez..</p>
<p>&#8220;I can tell you that I would rather have a single outstanding authority site link to my site naturally than all the backlinks I could collect from all the article directory and blog distribution centers put together.&#8221;</p>
<p>I hear ya. If you google &#8220;forgive all ebay sins&#8221; you will find that this particular pile of manure that I have fertilized the web with, has not done much in terms of &#8220;growing&#8221; my PR, or traffic..</p>
<p>Even though the article has been picked up by a variety of websites, I don&#8217;t think one web page where the article resides, has any substantial link juice or authority. </p>
<p>So, to your point about getting some authority site love, please to enjoy..</p>
<p>How to Get Featured on the New York Times, CNN, CNET and Newsweek..</p>
<p><a href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2008/10/05/how-to-get-featured-in-the-new-york-times-cnn-cnet-and-newsweek/" rel="nofollow">http://www.problogger.net/archives/2008/10/05/how-to-get-featured-in-the-new-york-times-cnn-cnet-and-newsweek/</a></p>
<p>It is by Kim Roach. You may know all of these<br />
methods already, but if not, then I hope you get something out of it. I know I did..</p>
<p>You would need to write some great content, but you got the skills to pay the bills &#8211; lol. </p>
<p>Coming up with one, or maybe two good stellar articles, including the link of choice, some anchor text, could be one way to get the authority link you seek. </p>
<p>Just sayin..</p>
<p>Robert C &#8211; The Wholesale Products Guy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

